[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#781927: marked as done (RFS: qemuctl/0.3.1-4 [ITA] -- control gui for qemu)



Your message dated Sun, 9 Aug 2015 10:54:11 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <405245293.1452549.1439117651226.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#781927: RFS: qemuctl/0.3.1-4 [ITA] -- control gui for qemu
has caused the Debian Bug report #781927,
regarding RFS: qemuctl/0.3.1-4 [ITA] -- control gui for qemu
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
781927: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781927
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear Mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for package "qemuctl"

   Package name    : qemuctl
   Version         : 0.3.1-4
   Upstream Author : Peter Rustler <qemuctl@chefpro.de>
   URL             : https://sourceforge.net/projects/qemuctl/files/
   License         : GPL-2+
   Section         : misc

  It builds those binary packages:

    * qemuctl - control gui for qemu

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/qemuctl


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qemuctl/qemuctl_0.3.1-4.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:

  * New maintainer. (Closes: #780270). 
  * Modified maintainer/vcs-fields in control.

  This bug-report is filed as response to 
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780270
  and there is no change in package contents, only maintaner
  has changed. 

  Regards,
   Antti Järvinen

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Antti,


>Not changed.



wonderful
>d/dirs is gone, package still seems to install all right and lintian
>is quiet.


Yes, this is something I tested prior to tell you, I do not remember
exactly, but d/install should already create the directory, so
d/dirs is not needed in that case.

(exporting DH_VERBOSE=1 in both cases and compare the build
logs might give you the hints about what is performed)

>Uh, oh, that was a real issue. The copyright of the .orig.tar.gz from
>upsteam is indeed gpl-3+ so the d/copyright file has been wrong all the
>time. The debian packaging files have been distributed with gpl-2+
>license and that I did not change now as I'd need to ask the previous
>copyright holders too about that -> leaving that part of license as it is. 


actually you can relicense, gpl-2+ means that you can change to gpl-3
or gpl-3+ without asking anybody.

different case would be the opposite, gpl-3 is more restrictive than 2,
so you can't change that unless you have permission from all the
previous copyright holders.

(note, please do not do such things and wouldn't sign a relicense of
debian/* to gpl-3 or gpl-3+, since gpl-2+ already contains all the
later versions giving a patch upstream will make that patch become
licensed under gpl-3+ automatically, it would be so unfair for other
Developers to relicense something with a more restrictive license)

>Corrected version is now available at mentors.d.n, the version
>uploaded with timestamp "2015-08-09 07:57" as they all have same name.


Yes, there is no need to specify that, I always grab from the same url,
so "updated" is enough (and since I recheck everything again it is fine).

Anyway, built&signed&uploaded while I was writing this mail, so
it should already be on its way for unstable :)

thanks again for your nice contribution to Debian!

cheers,

Gianfranco

--- End Message ---

Reply to: