Re: Cask & dependencies

[David Bremner <david@tethera.net>]

Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> writes:
>
> After:
> ,----
> | EMACSFLAGS = -L /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/dash-el \
> | 		-L /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa-src/noflet-*
> | test :
> | 	$(EMACS) --no-site-file --no-site-lisp --batch \
> | 		$(EMACSFLAGS) \
> | 		-l test/run-tests
> `----
>
> Is this the best way to work around upstream's usage of Cask?
>

It seems like a reasonable idea to me. Although I'm not really familiar
with cask, if I understand correctly, it's mainly about providing a
controlled test environment? This we can do via chroots.

d