[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal 

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multimail"

* Package name    : multimail
  Version         : 0.50~20150922-1
  Upstream Author : William McBrine <wmcbrine@gmail.com>
* URL             : http://multimail.sourceforge.net
* License         : GPL-3
  Section         : mail

It builds those binary packages:

 multimail  - Offline reader for Blue Wave, QWK, OMEN and SOUP
 multimail-dbg - debugging symbols for multimail

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/multimail

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/multimail/multimail_0.50~20150922-1.dsc

  More information about multimail can be obtained from  
http://multimail.sourceforge.net/.

  Changes since the last upload:

  * New maintainer. (Closes: #693230)
  * Add current debian/TODO file.
  * Add debian/watch file for use by uscan.
  * Rewrite debian/copyright in machine readable format.
  * Set package source format explicitly as '3.0 (quilt)'.
  * Changes to debian/control:
    - Add a multimail-dbg stanza.
    - Add a Homepage entry to the source package stanza.
    - Update debhelper Build-Depends version to '>= 9.0'.
    - Add '${misc:Depends}' to the binary package Depends line.
    - Set Standards-Version entry to 3.9.6, no changes required.
    - Change the Maintainer entry to be 'Robert James Clay <jame@rocasa.us'.
    - Add Vcs* entries for the 'collab-maint' repository at
      anonscm.debian.org.
  * Add initial version of debian/patches/Makefile.patch.
  * Rewrite debian/rules to be used for dh.


Also;  I am now a Debian Maintainer and I would appreciate having DM upload 
permissions added for my new package multimail after this new version is 
uploaded



  Regards,
   Robert James Clay


Reply to: