Re: unstripped-static-library
Hi Alex,
> >> First, according to the policy manual, we should support "nostrip" in
> >> "DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS", so we should probably wrap the rule with:
> >> ifeq (,$(filter nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
> >> some override_dh_strip stuff...
> >> endif
> >
> > Just put a blank 'override_dh_strip', doing nothing right ?
> >
> I mean the following:
> ifeq (,$(filter nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
> override_dh_strip:
> dh_strip
> find . -name '*.a' \( \! -name '*_g.a' \) \
> -exec strip --strip-debug \
> --remove-section=.comment \
> --remove-section=.note {} \;
> endif
>
> so that the debugging symbol are striped only if "nostrip" is not present.
> You can see <https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules-options>
> for more details.
Yes, doesn't need two override. Thanks to clarify this.
I will redo the package.
> >
> >> <https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/gthumb.html>
> >> reports gthumb is unreproducible because "Files have varying
> >> permissions because of different umasks" . It would be great to look
> >> into it if you have extra times.
> >>
> >
> > I looked this again. I did a 'grep -r umask' into gthumb-XX.orig
> > and I only see the use of it (the changes) by the upstream for
> > tmp stuff . In ltmain.sh and install-sh. "not to create temps
> > with too-generous modes.". The upstream also says something
> > about FreeBSD.
> >
> > I see 133, 22, 077 values.
> >
> > I don't know what to do about that.
> >
> Thanks for the extra info! I am new to the reproducible stuff as well.
> I will look into it later. The nondeterminism is introduced by a
> recent upload since this only affect unstable but not testing.
>
Ok.
Nice to talk to you.
regards,
--
Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn)
Reply to: