Re: RFS: self-serve photo booth software
A few more small questions, otherwise the photo-booth package is ready for
another review. [1] Thanks for all the help so far!
* The package name has changed since I filed the ITP bug. How can I update
the bug with a new package name, should I just reply with a human-readable
note to that effect?
* I accidentally ran "dput" without a host argument, which pushed my package
files to the production upload box. I've sent some commands to dcut rm,
hopefully that works correctly. It looks like the commands were consumed with
no effect on the photo-booth* files.
* Not sure why the copyright file is not linting. In the documentation, I
see that repeated licenses only need to be specified once. [2] There are
three files with the same license, and I only give the standalone paragraph
for the third. The second file causes a lint warning! Possibly a bug in
the lintian job?
-Adam
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/photo-booth
[2] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#stand-alone-license-paragraph
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:07:00AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Also, is it standard procedure to upload locally built packages to mentors.d.n,
> > or is that not necessary if I already have hosting for the files? [4]
>
> mentors does not distribute binary packages, which is what you have
> uploaded to github. Some sponsors are fine interacting with random git
> trees but others like to use the Debian source package (.dsc), which
> you haven't uploaded anywhere. Personally I'd suggest uploading the
> source package to mentors.
>
> --
> bye,
> pabs
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] CAKTje6Gua8ao9B+XcF8Af1PfzCCNF+gvmHk8Q1e7snmFtu=FXw@mail.gmail.com">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] CAKTje6Gua8ao9B+XcF8Af1PfzCCNF+gvmHk8Q1e7snmFtu=FXw@mail.gmail.com
Reply to: