On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 02:39:21PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
your other points appear to be correct, I will work on it.
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:42:36 -0500
> Paul Elliott <pelliott@blackpatchpanel.com> wrote:
> > Please criticize the package I have been working on
> > https://github.com/pelliott80/simplescreenrecorder-dpm.git
> > in a git repo in dpm format.
>
> -Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser refer to the VCS of the Debian packaging, not
> of upstream development
Debian Policy Manual
Chapter 5 - Control files and their fields
5.6.26 Version Control System (VCS) fields
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-VCS-fields
clearly states:
Debian source packages are increasingly developed using VCSs. The
purpose of the following fields is to indicate a publicly accessible
repository where the Debian source package is developed.
I interpreted "repository where the Debian source package is developed"
to mean that the VCS fields should point to the packaging source,
not the upstream source.
Experenced package maintainers please comment.
Am I wrong?
> -Is there any reason that you are limited to i386 and amd64?
The upstream did that, perhaps he had a good reason I will check.
> Riley Baird
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelliott@BlackPatchPanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature