[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Depends on exact version



Hi Daniel,

Could you try ${binary:Version} instead?

Cheers,

Roger


On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Daniel Lintott <daniel@serverb.co.uk> wrote:
> I have a package which is split into two sources (a server and gui). The
> server version should match the gui version (upstream version) at all times.
>
> Because of this when I'm creating the meta-package that will depend on
> both the gui and server, should be versioned to to be the same upstream
> version.
>
> To try and achieve this I've used the following:
>
>> Depends: ${misc:Depends},
>>  gns3-gui (= ${source:Upstream-Version}),
>>  gns3-server (= ${source:Upstream-Version})
>
> as I'm not worried about what the Debian revision is... but this doesn't
> seem to work when it comes to aptitude.
>
>> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
>> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
>> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
>> or been moved out of Incoming.
>> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>>
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>>  gns3 : Depends: gns3-gui (= 1.1) but it is not going to be installed
>>         Depends: gns3-server (= 1.1) but it is not going to be installed
>> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>
> From apt-cache policy gns3-*:
>
>> gns3-gui:
>>   Installed: (none)
>>   Candidate: 1.1-1~exp1
>>   Version table:
>>      1.1-1~exp1 0
>>         100 http://echo.internal.serverb.co.uk/debian/ experimental/contrib amd64 Packages
>
>> gns3-server:
>>   Installed: (none)
>>   Candidate: 1.1-1~exp1
>>   Version table:
>>      1.1-1~exp1 0
>>         100 http://echo.internal.serverb.co.uk/debian/ experimental/contrib amd64 Packages
>
> Any idea where I've gone wrong here?
>
> Regards
>
> Daniel
>


Reply to: