On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 03:51:01PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > >I also wonder if finding an arch-indep file in /usr/lib should > >result in an RC bug. > No. We should relax the policy to match the current practice. On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 03:40:33PM +0100, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote: > Since the Policy 9.1.1 states (see above) "... *must* comply with the > FHS", I would assume that the current agreement is that an > arch-independent file in /usr/lib/ is an RC bug. When this was not the > intention, it should be clarified in the policy (or the BTS docs). To clarify my position: I don't think the spirit of the FHS sections discussed here really forbids putting arch-indep files into /usr/lib and thus it is not an RC bug and we should not change anything in the Policy. If anything must be changed it's FHS. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature