Re: Different symbols for different architectures
Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> Seems that different architectures have different symbols.
> To me it doesn't look that simple, since the missing symbols are the
> same on many arches. It seems like upstream is basing the
> presence/absence of some public functions on what is returned by
> ./configure. For example rpl_strstr:
[...]
> If rpl_* means replacement for broken functions (I guess it does), it
> may even be leaking symbols that are meant to be private, which should
> definitely be fixed.
Something like
--- licenseutils-0.0.7.orig/src/Makefile.am
+++ licenseutils-0.0.7/src/Makefile.am
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ liblicenseutils_la_SOURCES=licensing.c g
include styles.am
liblicenseutils_la_LIBADD = @LIBINTL@ $(top_builddir)/lib/libgnu.la $(GLIB_LIBS) $(LIBPNG_LIBS)
-liblicenseutils_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:0:0 -export-dynamic -no-undefined
+liblicenseutils_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:0:0 -export-dynamic -no-undefined -export-symbols-regex '^lu_.*'
would help.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
Reply to: