Re: ITP to debian-devel vs. debian-mentors?

[Marwan Tanager <marwan.tngr@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 08:38:56PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> Hi Marwan,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Marwan Tanager <marwan.tngr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I'm a recent subscriber to the Debian mentors and developers lists, and I
> > notice that some ITP requests are sent to debian-devel against wnpp and others
> > to debian-mentors against sponsorship-requests.
> >
> > Could someone please clarify under what conditions should ITP requests be sent
> > to either lists and against either pseudo-packages, because the requests on
> > both lists look pretty similar?
> 
> ITP bug reports are (or at least should) always be cc-ed to
> debian-devel; they can be filed by both DDs and non-DDs.
> 
> Typically, package maintainers who are not either DDs or DMs, i.e. do
> not have upload rights to the Debian archive, will then file a RFS
> (request for sponsorship) bug report to ask for a DD to review and
> upload their package; these requests are always filed under the
> sponsorship-requests pseudo-package and cc-ed to debian-mentors.

Thanks, Vincent.

So, you're saying that if I've upload rights, I should file the report against 
wnpp and cc debian-devel?


--
	Marwan