[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#657428: RFS: surf -- simple web browser (QA upload)

On 17:52 Fri 27 Jan     , Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Vasudev Kamath <kamathvasudev@gmail.com>, 2012-01-27, 21:52:
> >>>  + Reduced the update-alternative priority to 30 as per
> >>>request   from user to the previous maintainer
> >>Hmm. Was there a bug report about that?
> >No previous maintainer Kai forwarded mail to me as I had adopted
> >his dwm package. I asked the reporter to raise a bug but he didn't
> >do that. So what do you suggest me to do for this? Shall I raise a
> >bug or its not required?.
> Well, I wanted to have some insight into what problem we're trying
> to solve here. Having it documented somewhere (preferably in a bug
> report) would be nice.

Done reported it as bugs by including mail content which I got and
added closes in changelog

> >>The hunk looks like this:
> >>
> >>+#export DH_VERBOSE=1
> >>+
> >>+-include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk
> >>
> >>Unfortunately, this _won't_ do the right thing for these
> >>dpkg-dev versions that didn't provide the
> >>/usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk file. Please see
> >><http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/10/msg00307.html>
> >>to understand why.
> >
> >Ok I went through the conversation so I need to build-depend on
> >dpkg-dev correct version for this and add conditional check for
> >buildflags.mk. Please correct me if I'm wrong
> There is more than one way to fix this. The simplest is to have
> versioned build-dependency on dpkg-dev. (And then you don't need "-"
> prefix before include, or other conditional checks.)

Done added a Build-Depends and removed - from rules.

Re uploaded package to mentors

Best Regards
Vasudev Kamath
GPG fingerprint = C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4  C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: