Re: RFS: uftp
Hello Benoît,
Thanks for your help, I've uploaded a new package to with the latest
uftp version here:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/uftp.
I've address your comments inline from before.
> - lintian gives a pedantic warning:
> P: uftp source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5
I made a lot of fixes and I don't see this error when I run lintian
--pedantic uftp_3.6.1-1.dsc, I only see:
W: uftp source: newer-standards-version 3.9.2 (current is 3.9.1)
which is because my system doesn't have the latest debian-policy package
> - The long description repeats the short description in
> debian/control.
Altered the first line not to repeat the short description.
> - In debian/rules, you exclude LICENSE.txt, but you explicitly listed
> it in debian/docs (I also don't think Changes.txt should be there).
> Also, why do you want to retain the Changes.txt name for the
> changelog?
Removed Changes.txt from docs and rules, removed LICENSE.txt from docs
>
> - What is the purpose of debian/status? It's almost identical to
> uftpd.init, but neither of them is installed. I guess you meant to
> call it uftp.init. You should also provide a uftp.default file with
> default settings for the daemon.
Delete debian/status.
Renamed uftpd.init to uftp.
Added a uftp.default file which send logfile to /var/log instead of /tmp/
>
> - Your watchfile doesn't work:
> dpkg: warning: version 'wireshark-plugin-src-0.0.2' has bad syntax: version number does not start with digit
> Processing watchfile line for package uftp...
> Newest version on remote site is wireshark-plugin-src-0.0.2, local version is 3.5.1
> dpkg: warning: version 'wireshark-plugin-src-0.0.2' has bad syntax: version number does not start with digit
> uftp: Newer version (wireshark-plugin-src-0.0.2) available on remote site:
> http://www.tcnj.edu/~bush/downloads/uftp-wireshark-plugin-src-0.0.2.tar
> (local version is 3.5.1)
Corrected to exclude wireshark, instead I just look for any two digit
version number with an optional third digit
>
> - In debian/copyright, GPL-3 should be GPL-3+.
Changed to GPL-3+ with OpenSSL exception
>
> - Your debian/changelog should document all your
> debian/patches/*.patch.
I added entries describing each patch.
> debian/patches/fix-bin-path.patch looks like
> a DEP-3 patch, but is not really compliant. You might want to have
> all your patches follow DEP-3.
I added to following to the top of that patch:
Description: Fix binary file paths to conform to Linux Filesystem
Hierarchy Standard
Forwarded: not-needed
Author: Frank Maker <frank.maker@gmail.com>
>
> - Regarding the upstream Readme.txt, it might be worth patching out
> the 'Building' and 'Running under Windows' sections.
Sounds fine, but can the manpage related entries for Windows stay? I think
that would be useful for users on networks with both types of systems.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Benoît Knecht
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20111221150648.GC14261@marvin.lan">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20111221150648.GC14261@marvin.lan
>
Reply to:
- References:
- RFS: uftp
- From: Frank Maker <frank.maker@gmail.com>
- Re: RFS: uftp
- From: Benoît Knecht <benoit.knecht@fsfe.org>