On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 10:46:06AM +0930, Karl Goetz wrote: > On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 03:02:37 +0200 > Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:10:19PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: > > > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > > > It has 2 type of --pedantic notice: > > > > P: wizznic source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary > > > > P: wizznic source: source-contains-prebuilt-binary > > > > > > Without any further review - this will need to be repackaged as > > > DFSG-free for an upload. It cannot be uploaded in this shape. Sorry. > > > > Why? Both of these files are DFSG free, merely just a waste of space. > > > > They take 0.6% of the source tarball, so the waste isn't that big > > either. > > There is 5mb of .o, .dll and .exe files in the tarball. Out of 55mb of > tarball thats not 0.6%. Right, I missed the .o and .dll files, counting only wizznic-x86-precompiled and tools/releaser/data/win/curl/curl.exe (the ones mentioned by lintian). The dlls are libjpeg, zlib, libogg, SDL, openssl -- all DFSG free with source already in main. It would be merely a bit of waste, except for one detail: the Windows binary is built against openssl while being GPLed without an openssl exception, and thus undistributable. So in the end the source tarball needs to be repacked, just not for the reasons stated. -- 1KB // Yo momma uses IPv4!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature