Paul, On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 11:33 +0100, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Kilian Krause wrote: > > > I do remember these "funny" situations where you autoconf with another > > version and/or another setup than upstream and configure was generated > > but broken. Thus all I was saying is that configure shouldn't be among > > those files dynamically generated on the buildd based on an unknown (at > > least in this regard) setup. > > This is like using upstream built .o files because GCC produced broken > code at some point. I would hope those days are behind us. I know it is, but that's at least until now my experiences. I'd also hope it'd be better and as you seem to suggest this is no longer the situation it used to be, I guess I'll give the next one a try. -- Best regards, Kilian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part