Hi, On 12/29/2011 02:40 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > The current package built fine in unstable (as --no-add-needed is not > the default yet). > > The other FTBFS bug (#565056) looks strange, more like a bug in gcc that > has been fixed since. Are you sure your upload changed anything > related? If not, the bug should be closed by mail instead. > I think #565056 and #606721 is familiar because all related to binutils-gold. I'm sure my upload will change even ld as-needed is not enabled yet, and who know it will be enabled again in the future? but i still open my mind about this change. > Besides the last point, the package looks fine. How long would you like > your upload to be delayed? > two or five days if fair enough because maintainer not responded at least a year. last upload also NMU too. > Regards, > Ansgar > > Thanks Asngar for review! -- [ Mahyuddin Susanto ] - http://udienz.web.id GPG: 4096R/90B36C5B Debian Maintainer - www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature