Re: RFS: python-poster (was: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer)
* Emilien Klein <emilien+debian@klein.st>, 2011-12-09, 16:22:
If I understand it correctly none of the changes I've made are
acceptable for an NMU. That's fine by me, as l'm just trying to get a
newer version that is free of the bug due to which I have to duplicate
code.
I'd happy to sponsor the NMU if it fixed this one thing.
If fixing part of the Lintian warnings are not fit for a NMU, I'll
gladly not do it ;)
Fixing lintian *errors* would be probably OK if done in a minimal way.
Just a question though:
+ * debian/watch:
+ - Add `debian uupdate` after the URL
Heavens forbid!
Could you please elaborate? Do you mean that this is not appropriate
for a NMU,
Yes.
or in general?
IMO[0] yes, too. I expect that if I call uscan, it'll download upstream
source, and that's it, not run some arbitrary commands.
[0] The rest of Debian community might not necessarily agree.
--
Jakub Wilk
Reply to: