Re: DEP-5 requirements
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charles,
On 22.08.2011 15:12, Charles Plessy wrote:
> DEP 5 will be distributed in the debian-policy package (see #609160), but there
> is not plan of making it part of the Policy, in the sense of being mandatory or
> strongly recommended.
I didn't imply any "must"/"required" constraints as per policy
definition. I intended the "may" in my sentence as normatively defined
in the policy.
Yet I am curious, whether you know about concrete plans to integrate
DEP-5 into the policy. I don't mean the wording itself, where I am fine
to have it referenced in the policy only, but about the normative meanings.
Your explanation implies, it won't be "must" or "should", so I can
conclude "may" or no reference at all?
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=EXDA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: