Hi again, > Le Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:45:53 +0100, > Michael Tautschnig <mt@debian.org> a écrit : > > > - Use the c++ tag to move to human-readable symbols and get rid of problems due > > to different name mangling schemes. > > yes it is nicer with c++ tag, is there an automatic way to convert a symbol file to > this human readable format. Please take a look at this [1] post to the list. > Should I tune my rule file to generate automatically a symbol file with thoses c++ tag. > I don't think there's any tuning need in your rules file. > > - Combine this with regex to work around 32/64 bits issues. > > - Both of this is quite extensively documented in the dpkg-gensymbols man page. > > Yes there is plenty of explanation in the man page but I need a lot > more practice to learn about symbols. > Sometimes I do not know if it > Hmm, I'm not sure I understand that last sentence!? > > - Take a look at some existing package that makes use of these features, for > > example my "diagnostics" package. > > I took a look at your package, nice symbol fil and I like the symbol > split between symbols, optional, stacktrace(what for ?). It requier a > huge knowledge of the projet internals. > Which project internals do you refer to? "stacktrace" is just a sub-part of diagnostics that isn't available on all architectures, hence the split-out of this part. Hope this helps, Michael [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/07/msg00360.html
Attachment:
pgphmt0En40JF.pgp
Description: PGP signature