Kilian Krause <kilian@debian.org> writes: > Hi Ben, > > On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 17:10 +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > > Lintian recommends (via tag ‘debian-rules-missing-recommended-target’): > > > > ===== > > N: Note that the following form is recommended however: > > N: > > N: build: build-arch build-indep > > N: build-arch: build-stamp > > N: build-indep: build-stamp > > N: build-stamp: > > N: build here > > ===== > > If you're sure that you want to use dh but .PHONY then just put into > your rules something like: > > build-indep: > dh $@ > build-arch: > dh $@ > build: build-arch build-indep > > No need for a stamp as dh is already producing stamps internally. This doesn't match Lintian's recommendation. Nor does the common ‘%:’ style rule. Should Lintian's recommendation be changed? -- \ “Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?” “I think so, | `\ Brain, but why would anyone want to see Snow White and the | _o__) Seven Samurai?” —_Pinky and The Brain_ | Ben Finney
Attachment:
pgpuePnbWY0Fc.pgp
Description: PGP signature