[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: jampal_02.01.05-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Thanks Kilian

I will create a repackaged source with a new version number 02.01.05-2,
with the "looks" directory excluded.
I will add a get-orig-source target that creates the repackaged source,
and try to conform with Debian developers Reference ( Repackaged
upstream source).
At this time I will not change the upstream source.


On 7/26/2011 12:29 PM, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:39:18PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
>> Am 26.07.2011 16:32, schrieb Peter Bennett:
>>> The looks/*.jar files are not distributed in the package. They are
>>> present in the source because I do
>>> distribute them with the Windows version of jampal.
>>> Jampal runs fine without them, and some of them are available as
>>> separate packages in Debian, so the
>>> user can install them if he wants to.
>>> What do I need to do about this? Do I need a repackaged source?
>> yes, that would be an option.
> I guess that would be one preferred method. Or as you're upstream yourself
> you can as well leave the compiled *.jar out of any release tarball and
> compile them as part of the windows build process. Alternatively you can
> ship them in the *.zip for Windows and leave them excluded in the *.tar.gz
> for Linux.
> Which one you prefer is up to you. 

Reply to: