Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

[Nicolas <nikrou77@gmail.com>]

Hi all,

I think and I hope that time it's ok :

- I add description for expat and apache license

- I add a special stanza and only one for LGPL-3 license

- I remove email for bug. 

All changes push to mentors and git repository.

Regards,

Nicolas

Le 2 juillet 2011 12:28, Benoît Knecht <benoit.knecht@fsfe.org> a écrit :

Hi Kilian,

Kilian Krause wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> > Nicolas wrote:
> > > > Same as LGPL, the copyright is not the same.
> >
> > Again, you must include the text of the license in a stand-alone License
> > paragraph.
>
> actually you may be interested in the base-files package having
> /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-3
> which would make a reference to that file sufficient IMHO.

I was referring to the Apache and Expat licenses, that do not have a
stand-alone License section at all, in violation of DEP-5. You're
absolutely right about referring to the common-licenses files instead of
including the full text of the license, but a stand-alone License
paragraph is still required in that case.

Cheers,

--
Benoît Knecht


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Archive: [🔎] 20110702102826.GE13059@marvin.lan" target="_blank">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20110702102826.GE13059@marvin.lan