Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)
thanks for your time.
Sven Hoexter <email@example.com> wrote on 2011-05-29 18:52:
> * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no security fixes
> and we're not in the middle of the release process. So urgency=low should
> be used.
There is a reason: package libdb4.7 isn't anymore and if someone want to
install (new) squidguard it would be not usable (in testing). Can I use
urgency=medium (5 days)?
> * Vcs-Browser should point to the gitweb frontend and not to the http
> access for the git repository itself. So in this case this should be
There is a terrible muddle with the new Alioth. I had looked onto the git
repository which show us the following addresses:
and I have thought, this is be right. But what is right now ????
And if not, what should be the right git address (git://)?
> And a minor one from lintian pedantic checks:
> squidguard.config uses /bin/sh -e instead of set -e.
Have a nice day.