[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: haskell-qt

On Wednesday, 25. May 2011. 9.49.34 Joachim Breitner wrote:
> we prefer to treat all haskell packages equally, e.g. having their
> debian directory in the Darcs repo unter the pkg-haskell alioth project.
> Have you considered joining the Debian Haskell Group to maintain
> haskell-qt? And do you plan to package more Haskell libraries? And what
> exactly do you need haskell-qt for, e.g. what package depends on it?

Surely I would maintain haskell-qt (or qtHaskell as it is originally called), 
and I would be glad to join the Debian Haskell Group. As for more libraries, I 
could package some more, but I didn't plan to for now.

I am not aware of packages that depend on qthaskell. Generally, I packaged 
qthaskell because I like qt and like haskell. :)

> And why is haskell-qt not on hackage?

I really have no idea. Possibly because it cannot be built only with cabal, 
one must first build the c-bits subpackage with qmake&&make and then the 
remainder of the package using cabal.

Filip Brcic <brcha@gna.org>
WWWeb: http://brcha.com
Jabber  : brcha@kdetalk.net 
GPG 0x2537C379
Fingerprint: 287D 5F24 50AA A36C 977F AC9A F1FD C7EB 2537 C379

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: