Re: On diverting an ITP to non-free
* Mats Erik Andersson <firstname.lastname@example.org> [110323 12:29]:
> Not imagining myself to ever intend to bother about the
> non-free category, I am now prepared to make an exception,
> butvI run into the problem of understanding whether my
> packaging should mark this as non-free, or if my sponsor
> simply deposits the package in a non-regular NEW-queue?
You set that debian/control. Just add 'non-free/' to the existing
But as others have said: Why not split the package into two, if upstream
is not willing to change that?