Re: On diverting an ITP to non-free

[Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <tolimar@debian.org>]

Hi!

* Mats Erik Andersson <mats.andersson@gisladisker.se> [110323 12:29]:

> Not imagining myself to ever intend to bother about the
> non-free category, I am now prepared to make an exception,
> butvI run into the problem of understanding whether my
> packaging should mark this as non-free, or if my sponsor
> simply deposits the package in a non-regular NEW-queue?

You set that debian/control.  Just add 'non-free/' to the existing
section entry.

But as others have said: Why not split the package into two, if upstream
is not willing to change that?

Best Regards,
  Alexander