Re: On diverting an ITP to non-free
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Paul Wise wrote:
> If it is just the documentation that is non-free and upstream refuses
> to drop the invariant sections, I would suggest to either drop it or
> split it out into a non-free source package.
Split it to a non-free source package, please. Debian's quality
suffered a lot from the non-freeness of the GNU project documentation,
we lost a lot of documentation that really hampers offline work.
If it is in non-free, at least it is easy to install for offline work.
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot