[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Review of pev



Hello, Scott.

I have read in the Mentor's wiki that is a good idea ask for help here before upload the package. ;)

If it's not the common way, please let me know.

Thank you.

Att,

@Fernando Mercês
Linux Registered User #432779
www.mentebinaria.com.br
http://linuxreversing.org
http://softwarelivre-rj.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Participe do I Hack'n Rio, dias 8 e 9 de abril na UFRJ!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------



On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Scott Howard <showard314@gmail.com> wrote:
2011/1/11 Fernando Mercês <nandu88@gmail.com>:
> Hello, Manuel.
>
> Many thanks for your support.
> I've fixed the problems and now I'm providing unsigned source and binary
> packages at http://www.mentebinaria.com.br/coding40/pev_0.22-r2.tar.gz
> I think it's enough to get reviews, right? Before upload, I know that I need
> to sign both .dsc and .changes files.
> Cheers,
>
> @Fernando Mercês

For future reference, http://mentors.debian.net is very helpful for
sharing source packages. It lets you upload source packages, does a
quick lintian check and allows someone to use "dget" to check your
package.

See:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-intro

Also, debexpo is a similar tool, but I think it is still in beta stages.

~Scott


Reply to: