Re: Review of pev

[Fernando Mercês <nandu88@gmail.com>]

Hello, Manuel.

Many thanks for your support.

I've fixed the problems and now I'm providing unsigned source and binary packages at http://www.mentebinaria.com.br/coding40/pev_0.22-r2.tar.gz

I think it's enough to get reviews, right? Before upload, I know that I need to sign both .dsc and .changes files.

Cheers,

@Fernando Mercês

Linux Registered User #432779

www.mentebinaria.com.br

http://linuxreversing.org

http://softwarelivre-rj.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Participe do I Hack'n Rio, dias 8 e 9 de abril na UFRJ!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2011/1/11 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo@gmail.com>

Hello Fernando,

First of all I am no "mentor", just a regular package, and don't have years
of experience with this, but I'll review your package anyway.  Hopefully
something else gets interested and helps to review it, too.

On Tuesday 11 January 2011 08:00:39 Fernando Mercês wrote:
> Hello, mentors.
> I would appreciate if you can look at my package and tell me if is
> something wrong. Will be my first package.
> The package name is pev and the tarball can be downloaded on
> http://www.mentebinaria.com.br/coding40/pev_0.22-1.tar.gz
> Thanks.

The contents of the debian/ directory look more or less fine, save for the
following details:

- The files "files" and "pev.debhelper.log" which, as far as I known, are
unnecessary.

- The changelog should contain the name of a distribution -- "unstable" by
default.


But what you should really get done for future versions/revisions is to
present to this mailing list the source and maybe binary packages (as built
by "debuild").


Cheers, and congratulations for your first package :)
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo@gmail.com>