On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 07:18:36PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > A quick hint below. As I have not got the complete picture, do bare > with me if I misunderstood the remark. > > måndag den 29 mars 2010 klockan 18:42 skrev Jan Hauke Rahm detta: > > Hi Ignace, > > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:19:23PM +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:55, Jan Hauke Rahm <jhr@debian.org> wrote: > > > > reloads. Don't you think? > > > > > > As iptotal should work with other web-servers supporting CGI, I chose > > > his webserver. What do you think about that? > > > > postinst. But that's your call. As a user I would probably be confused > > if files moved from /var/www to /usr/lib to /var/lib. :) > > > > Any non-webserver package installing files into /var/www would > violate LHS policy. Right? I did repare a handful such violations > this past winter. *Any* package installing files into /var/www violates FHS/policy as that's the web root for the system admin, not the maintainer. Thus the changes in the package here and the moving around of old files in postinst. Hauke
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature