Re: RFS: slimrat
Hi!
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Michal Čihař <nijel@debian.org> wrote:
> You should use ${source:Version} for arch:all packages as these can not
> be binnmued.
This is true when we are declaring a dependency of an arch:any package
to an arch:all.
But for slimrat, there are two arch:all packages only (arch:all
depending on arch:all).
In practice (and while we don't have binNMUs of arch:all packages),
the result will be the same if using ${source:Version} or
${binary:Version}, won't it?
Best regards,
Nelson
Reply to: