Re: RFS: lilo (updated package) (new Maintainer)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-12-12 19:43, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Hello Niels,
>
> Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> wrote on 2010-12-12 17:18:
>
>> [...]
>> For the next non-Squeeze upload you may want to consider using the 3.0
>> (quilt) format, since it supports binary files in the debian dir
>> (insteand of the uudecode) as well as cleaning up in the d/rules file
>> (e.g. using dh_clean instead of multiple "rm -f" etc)
> The next (already made) package with lilo 23.1 will use all new "dh"
> methods with format 3.0 (quilt). You can see the "unofficial" packages
> here: http://lilo.alioth.debian.org/ftp/
>
>> Also the old maintainer is still listed as the "primary maintainer" in
>> d/copyright.
> With the new file format (see above) it is gone.
>
On 2010-12-12 17:46, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> I know that problem. The most problems come from the special script
> 'liloconfig' which uses with debconf (but it should not do). It is a
> legacy.
Sounds good :) I was not sure how much you had done in your 23.1 package
(I did not check it)
On 2010-12-12 17:46, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> [...]
> Should I nevertheless do an update of the package to
> give the release team the chance to let it into Squeeze?
> [...]
In this case, I believe none of the changes mentioned here are worth
trouble for a second upload for Squeeze (given that the release team
were okay with the current package). Personally I would probably just do
them in the next Squeeze + 1 upload.
~Niels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=QtoM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: