[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: lilo (updated package) (new Maintainer)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2010-12-12 16:05, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2010-12-11 18:29, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
>> [...]
>> This update of the LILO package (based on lilo 22.8-8.3) comes with a 
>> small set of bugfixes to work better within Squeeze. The target is to 
>> enter to testing before Squeeze will be released (I hope to the release
>> team).
> 
> 
> Your priority being what it is; you should aim for fixing critical or
> highly annoying bugs with the minimal number of changes. If the diff
> gets to large, the release team may choose to reject it because they
> cannot keep track of the changes.
> 
> Have you talked with the release team about the bugs you are fixing? I
> can understand the feeling of wanting to fix as much as possible, but
> the release team may feel the bugs are not important enough for the
> changes required.
> 
> [...]

Hi again,

I had a chat with Mehdi on IRC and they seemed positive about the
changes (even those I would have minimalised). I will have a second look
at it and upload to unstable unless I notice a real issue. :)

~Niels

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=2HiY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: