Re: RFS: coffeescript
On 04/02/2010 05:42 AM, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> I've added descriptions to the patches, as recommended by DEP-3. I'm not
>> forwarding the patches upstream, as they mostly relate to
>> debian-specific quirks and are not generally useful (specifically, one
>> deals with Node.js being installed to /usr/bin/nodejs in Debian instead
>> of upstream's default location at /usr/bin/node, and the other is simply
>> to allow coffee to be installed directly in /usr/bin/coffee instead of
>> /usr/lib/coffeescript/coffee, whereas upstream instead uses an
>> unnecessary symlink).
>
> OK I suspected that. That's one of the important things that could
> live in a patch description/header ;)
>
I've added the Forwarded: not-needed tag (described in DEP-3) to the
patches to indicate that they aren't meant to be forwarded upstream.
> debian/rules is just a makefile, you can call chmod from there.
>
I have added an override for dh_fixperms that does this.
Thanks,
Geza
Reply to: