On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:44:20PM -0400, Geza Kovacs wrote: > (Please CC any replies to me) > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "coffeescript". > > It builds these binary packages: > coffeescript - interpreter and compiler for the CoffeeScript language > coffeescript-doc - documentation for coffeescript Quoting Upstream Website: > Disclaimer: CoffeeScript is just for fun. Until it reaches 1.0, > there are no guarantees that the syntax won't change between > versions. That said, it compiles into clean JavaScript (the good > parts) that can use existing JavaScript libraries seamlessly, and > passes through JSLint without warnings. The compiled output is quite > readable — pretty-printed, with comments preserved intact. Do you think it's sensible to have that packaged in debian (and it's stable releases)? Looks rather like a volatile thing where one wants for a 1.0 before packaging to me (though that impressin is based on a quick look on the webpage so you may know better ;)) Regards Christoph -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731 \ / Campaign : CaCert Assurer X against HTML : Debian Developer / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature