Re: RFS: collectl
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Russ Allbery <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hm, isn't the obvious and simple way of implementing this change to just
> create a second class of buildds that do exactly what the current ones do
> but then throw out all the arch-dependent packages and only keep the
> arch-independent ones? Or even more simply, just designate one
> architecture (i386 perhaps) to keep all the results of the build including
> the arch-independent packages?
Hmm, I guess so.
> That's what I assume was going to happen, which unfortunately doesn't
> imply fixing any of the problems you note.
Aye, we'll see I guess.