Il giorno mer, 02/09/2009 alle 14.12 +0800, Paul Wise ha scritto: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Ludovico > Cavedon<ludovico.cavedon@gmail.com> wrote: > > > are .mo file considered source, i.e. is an upstream tarball containing > > .mo files ok? > > > > Or is it necessary to have .po files? > > > > If .po files are necessary, but available only via Mercurial, should I > > get the source from SCM, remove the .hg* file and repackage it? > > >From what you have said, upstream is modifying the .po files so they > should be considered the source. I recommend asking upstream to ship > .po files instead of .mo files and convert .po to .mo at build time. > In all my (upstream) programs tarballs I ship .mo AND .po files, so that regeneration isn't necessary but source is present (and can also be used to provide further translations). Pietro
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Questa =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente