Re: Bug#554167: RFC: mawk (not maintainer, updated package)
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:04:17AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> I am wondering what to do next: should I pursue a 14-day delayed NMU?
>> Do nothing and hope some of my changes are picked up?
>
> An unsanctioned NMU of a new upstream version of a Priority: required
> package? No.
To be fair, I was only asking for advice. Probably this is confusing
because -mentors gets used both for sponsored uploads and packaging
advice.
Jonathan
Reply to: