[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: acx100 (updated package)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

M. van Brummelen schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
>> Also you have to fix two things in your acx100 changes:
> 
>> I: acx100 source: build-depends-without-arch-dep cpio
> 
>> N:
> 
>> N:    The control file lists the given package in Build-Depends, but
> no
>> N:    architecture-dependent packages are built. If all the packages
> built are
>> N:    architecture-independent, the only packages that should be
> listed
> in
>> N:    Build-Depends are those required to run the clean target (such
> as
>> N:    debhelper if you use dh_clean). Other build dependencies
> should be
>> N:    listed in Build-Depends-Indep instead.
> 
>> N:
> 
>> N:    Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 7.7 (Relationships
> between
> source
>> N:    and binary packages - Build-Depends, Build-Depends-Indep,
> 
>> N:    Build-Conflicts, Build-Conflicts-Indep) for details.
> 
>> N:
> 
>> N:    Severity: minor, Certainty: possible
> 
>> and the second one:
>> I: acx100 source: dpatch-missing-description
> 02_fix_irqreturn_t.dpatch
>> I: acx100 source: dpatch-missing-description 03_typo_fix.dpatch
> I uploaded a new version, which solves the described issues.
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/a/acx100
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
> main contrib non-free
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/a/acx100/acx100_20080210-1.1.dsc

Thanks for your contribution, uploaded.

- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
 Patrick Matthäi
 GNU/Linux Debian Developer

E-Mail: pmatthaei@debian.org
        patrick@linux-dev.org

Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkr67BgACgkQ2XA5inpabMc2qQCfT5CUhq1w27/zNzPHYTJjzOnf
tnAAn2F8kQ0RaLlww4MO789E/jywOHpD
=WucU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: