Hello, the developers of an app I'm packaging, denemo (www.denemo.org) do not use (it is there, but not updated since months) the file ChangeLog. However, they do keep a list of changes, which they published, for the last release, in their site and on the mailing list, and which content would be the perfect content for filling a changelog. [0] Do you suggest me to: - patch the changelog/introduce a new one, and then install it, or - in debian/changelog, after "New upstream release", list all of those changes? I tend to see the second option as cleaner, but I don't know if ~20 lines of changelog entry for a new upstream release would be considered too verbose. thanks in advance for any hint Pietro P.S: yes, I may ask them to change their policy... for the next release. P.P.S: I'm taking care of this package since few months... under previous maintainer, the upstream ChangeLog was still updated [0]: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/denemo-devel/2009-11/msg00024.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Questa =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente