Re: Lintian pickiness and packaging improvements
On Wed, Oct 21 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Pedantic tags are Lintian at its most pickiest and include
>> checks for particular Debian packaging styles, *checks that are
>> very frequently wrong*, and checks that many people disagree
>> with. Expect false positives and Lintian tags that you don't
>> consider useful if you use this option. Adding overrides for
>> pedantic tags is probably not worth the effort.
> As the person who pushed and introduced pedantic support I always felt
> a bit hesitant regarding the highlighted statement, maybe I should
> bring this up on the lintian mailing list and ask Russ for his reasons
> behind it (maybe what he wanted to express could be paraphrased).
> If a check is wrong I don't think it should belong to the pedantic
> category, IMHO.
I also think that style issues should not be a part of even
Pedantic checks. If a package is using a different, and arguably
better style, then lintian should keep its nose out.
"Part of the inhumanity of the computer is that, once it is competently
programmed and working smoothly, it is completely honest." -Isaac Asimov
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C