Updated package has been uploaded to mentors. This new package builds the different frameworks as separate binary packages and moves the extraneous dojox files to /usr/share/doc/libjs-dojo-dojox/examples/ maintaining the directory structure. On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 23:50 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Sorry to bother, but : > > > find . -name *.php > ./dojox/analytics/logger/dojoxAnalytics.php > ./dojox/analytics/logger/JSON.php > ./dojox/form/resources/RecieveFile.php > ./dojox/form/resources/cLOG.php > ./dojox/form/resources/UploadFile.php > ./dojox/resources/explore.php > ./dojox/grid/compat/tests/support/data.php > ./dojox/grid/compat/tests/support/json.php > > find . -name *.sh > ./dojox/storage/buildFlashStorage.sh > > find . -name *.fla > ./dojox/storage/storage_dialog.fla > > find . -name *.as > ./dojox/flash/ExpressInstall.as > ./dojox/flash/DojoExternalInterface.as > ./dojox/storage/Storage.as > > Those files should not be placed in /usr/share/javascript !!! > I just went to http://www.dojotoolkit.org/ > (i'm a jquery fan:) and discovered that in fact, > dojo, dijit, dojox represent three separate frameworks, with different needs, > so there should be three packages from one source : > libjs-dojo-core > libjs-dojo-dijit > libjs-dojo-dojox > > however i can't really think of a way to package the last one, since > php, as, fla, sh files are mixed between static html, css, js files in that package. > But that should not stop you from packaging the first two. > > Maybe i'm totally wrong, somebody, please tell me. > > Regards, > Jérémy. >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part