[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: libvigraimpex (updated package)



> Dear mentors,

Hello,

> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.0-2
> of my package "libvigraimpex".
> 
> It builds these binary packages:
> libvigraimpex-dev - development files for the C++ computer vision library
> libvigraimpex-doc - Documentation for the C++ computer vision library
> libvigraimpex2ldbl - C++ computer vision library
> 
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
> 
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvigraimpex
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
> - dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvigraimpex/libvigraimpex_1.6.0-2.dsc
> 
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

I'm not that optimistic with the C++ code and symbols files. 

First, yours appear to be architecture dependent:
http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/seedsymbols?pkgname=libvigraimpex2ldbl

Second, there are problems: see #521569 and the whole thread at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/04/msg00297.html

Third, as I can see from debian/rules, dh_makeshlibs won't pass any check 
option to dpkg-gensymbols and the default -c1 is used which is a request for 
FTBFS on certain architectures in that case.

So, I suggest we remove the symbols part or simply disable it (pass -c0 to 
dpkg-gensymbols, as I did with one of my library packages bobcat) until a 
better solution is found or GCC people accept the solution provided at: 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36022
 
The rest of your package looks good to me. There are no dramatic changes as 
compared to the previous version.

-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>


Reply to: