On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 03:18:48PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Not that anyone gets this right in practice, but I think calling > update-alternatives unconditionally in postinst is the correct way to > handle the error rollback cases. > > You don't want to call it unconditionally in prerm because you don't > want to call it on upgrade normally, but there isn't a similar case for > postinst. I'll happily bow to experience on this one. (I had not take preinst into account.) -- Jonathan Wiltshire 1024D: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature