[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: roxterm (new maintainer, 1.15.1-1 ready for sponsored release)



(IANADD, so no upload from me - sorry)

On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 10:43:04PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
> Lintian gave a couple of warnings because it thought I was trying to
> perform a NMU. Presumably a sponsor will update the system to list me as
> maintainer and that will be resolved?

At the moment you are NMUing because your changelog tail doesn't match
the Maintainer field in debian/control. Set the Maintainer to you to
indicate that you're adopting this package.

Lintian also complains that:

P: roxterm source: direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system
roxterm-config.1 and 1 more
P: roxterm: copyright-refers-to-symlink-license
usr/share/common-licenses/GPL
I: roxterm: desktop-entry-contains-encoding-key
/usr/share/applications/roxterm.desktop:2 Encoding

(to see this output, run lintian with -IE --pedantic)

They're not the end of the world, but you should take care of them if
you can.

I may be wrong, but you should probably test in your postinst what apt
wants you to do (install, upgrade, abort etc). See
/usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debian/postinst.ex for an example. The
summary at the top is useful. Blindly using 'update-alternatives
--install' isn't very helpful in some circumstances. Your prerm script
does do this check.


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire

1024D: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3  A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: