Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 22:40 +0200 schrieb Evgeni Golov: > > > + COPYING says GPL-2+, you write GPL-2 for upstreams code? > > > > COPYING only says, that it is GPL-2. It does not specify if it is "v2 > > only" or "v2 or later". So we should assume "v2 only". > > COPYING is a pure copy of the GPL v2, which also includes the stanza > one should copy to the source files: > [...] > This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > (at your option) any later version. > [...] > That's why I'm asking. We have no headers in the files that reproduce > this (or the no-"at your option"" version). The pure copy of the GPL-2 means, that it is licensed under GPL-2. This paragraph is a recommendation. The main copyright rule: If you are unsure, assume the worst case. Cheers, Benjamin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil