Re: RFS: gearmand
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Monty Taylor schrieb:
>> I have fixed that, and have uploaded a new version to mentors. Upstream
>> released a new version today which fixed some of the problems I'd found
>> in packaging the first time.
>
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gearmand/gearmand_0.6-1.dsc
>
> * debian/control:
> - There are some ${shlibs:Depends} missing
fixed.
> - Why are you using direct depends on libfooX (=) instead of
> shlibs:Depends?
Because I suck. Fixed.
> * debian/rules:
> - Do you realy need chrpath? Have you tried out the configure option
> --disable-rpath?
> - If you want to use chrpath, you have to build depend on it
Hrm. Apparently not. That makes me happy - I can remove this from
another package as well.
> * debian/gearman-server.init:
> - What happens if /var/run is not present/mounted on a ramfs?
I think this is fixed - lemme know what you think of the changes.
> * debian/libgearman-dev.lintian-overrides:
> - Are you sure that this file is needed?
Nope. In fact, it's not needed. I _was_ during 0.5 and I just forgot to
remove it. Fixed.
> lintian:
> Please patch the manpage:
> I: gearman-client: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign
> usr/share/man/man1/gearman.1.gz:10
> I: gearman-client: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign
> usr/share/man/man1/gearman.1.gz:16
> I: gearman-client: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign
> usr/share/man/man1/gearman.1.gz:22
> .. and get sure that you use a patch system for your changes ;)
Fixed.
> Also:
> I: libgearman-dev: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 6588kB 94%
>
> You might split up the package in an arch any and arch all one.
I was considering making a libgearman-doc package with all the API docs
in it. If I do that, should I go the whole doc-base route? How did you
get lintian to spit out the arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share error?
Mine isn't doing that...
New version with all but arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share fixed has
been uploaded.
Thanks!
Monty
Reply to: