Hi, On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:00:00PM -0700, Ludovico Cavedon wrote: > My actual problem is: > -current version of qutecom is "2.2~rc3.dfsg1" > -as per lintian warning, the next version will be "+dfsg1" instead of > ".dfsg1" > -latest upstream version is still 2.2~rc3, but I would like to upload a > more recent snapshot from upstream hg. What would be the correct > packager version? > > - "2.2~rc3+hg365+dfsg1", being lucky that "+hg" comes after "+dfsg" > - "2.2~rc3-hg365+dfsg1", but would have the "-" any drawback I do not see? What about actually checking some possibilities: $ dpkg --compare-versions 2.2~rc3+hg365+dfsg1 gt 2.2~rc3.dfsg1 && echo true $ dpkg --compare-versions 2.2~rc3+hg365.dfsg1 gt 2.2~rc3.dfsg1 && echo true $ dpkg --compare-versions 2.2~rc3.dfsg1+hg365 gt 2.2~rc3.dfsg1 && echo true true $ dpkg --compare-versions 2.2~rc3+hg365+dfsg1 gt 2.2~rc3.dfsg1 && echo true $ dpkg --compare-versions 2.2~rc3-hg365.dfsg1 gt 2.2~rc3.dfsg1 && echo true $ dpkg --compare-versions 2.2~rc3.dfsg1+hg365 gt 2.2~rc3.dfsg1 && echo true true $ dpkg --compare-versions 2.2~rc3.hg365.dfsg1 gt 2.2~rc3.dfsg1 && echo true true $ dpkg --compare-versions 2.2~rc3+hg365+dfsg1 gt 2.2~rc3+dfsg1 && echo true true Seems like you need to trick a bit and change your versioning... Cheers, Hauke
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature