Evgeni Golov wrote: > On Thu, 7 May 2009 01:41:01 +0200 Evgeni Golov wrote: > >> + grep -ri licen gnome-*/* |grep -vi "GPL/2.0" |grep -vi "cc:license" >> is interesting too, it lists LGPL and CC-BY-SA-2.0 and 2.5 too. >> And also CC-BY-NC-3.0 too - this is non-free! :( > > Ew, forgot to mention that CC-*-1.x and 2.x are considered non-free > too :( Although for 2.x you can distribute derivative works under a later version of the license (e.g. 3.0), so if we considerate Debian packaging a derivative work, that would be fine. I seem to recall there is stuff in the archive that is licensed under CC-BY-SA 2.5, probably due to the above reasoning. Best, Emilio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature