Le samedi 18 avril 2009 à 22:39, Russ Allbery a écrit : > Laurent Léonard <email@example.com> writes: > > I agree with that. My question only concerns thx "+dfsgX" versioning > > instead of a simple "+dfsg" suffix in this case where there is only 1 > > documentation file dropped for DFSG reason. > > Given that +dfsg1 sorts after +dfsg anyway, I think it's fine to omit the > version number if you expect not to need it. I plan on starting to omit > the version number after dfsg in the next upstream release for some of my > repackaged source packages where the repackaging has been stable for quite > some time. > > -- > Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> I just uploaded kio-ftps 0.2+dfsg-1 on mentors.debian.net. I fixed/improved the package according to the comments of this thread. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kio-ftps - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kio-ftps/kio-ftps_0.2-2.dsc Thank you, -- Laurent Léonard
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.