Hi Don Thanks for the fast reply. On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 11:51:08PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 02 Feb 2009, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > tuxcmd is currently by upsteam "restricted" to the Architectures i386 > > and x86_64. [1]. As suggested in a previous thread I had put > > > > Architecture: any > > > > in the control file, and now I'm having the following situation: On > > powerpc all Build-Depends are satisfied, and also the package get's > > build, but tuxcmd will not work at all on this architecture. > > Why not? There's nothing obvious about tuxcmd that makes it only > suitable for i386 and amd64. If it doesn't work properly on archs > other than i386 and amd64, that sounds like bugs that should be fixed > (likely resulting from poor coding practices on the part of upstream.) Yes I see. > If neither you nor upstream is able to resolve the bugs due to lack of > access to powerpc architecture machines (or any of the other > architectures that this package can build successfully on) I'd suggest > talking to the powerpc porters (and other arch porters) for > assistance. Indeed I currently have only access to i386 and amd64 machines and so I'm neither able to debug #513891. So I will contact upstream about that and the powerpc porters and ask if they could help. Thanks for your reply and kind regards Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature