[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: gxemul (new upstream)



On Saturday 03 January 2009 12:54:01 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > * README.Debian could be dropped, it talks about gxemul-doc, while
> > control:gxemul has it listed in recommends, which will do the job.
>
> Ok, dropped it.

It would be even better to downgrad that to Suggests: gxemul-doc, since it is 
somehow a large -doc package. Nothing urgent.

> > * if you push 01_manhyphens_patch.dpatch upstream, you can further drop
> > dpatch
>
> It's gone upstream, but hasn't gone into the source yet. But when it
> does, it will indeed be nice to lose dpatch now it has done its job :-)

Ok.

> I've also now published the git repository and added Vcs-* fields to
> debian/control.

Very good... a chance to strech debcheckout a bit, since I've never used it 
before ;-)

> Uploaded as before 

Uploaded to sid. 

> (let me know if you'd prefer a version bump).  

I do prefer version bump myself (since that avoids repetitive reviewing from 
scratch, which to be honest turned out to gain over some leftover 
improvements ;-), but I'm not that picky and leave that at sponsoree's own 
discretion, so it is fine with me.

> Thanks for the quick reply!

Thanks for your contribution!

-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: